Anthony
Cole
George VI Specialist
George VI Varieties
This web site contains scans of mostly
unlisted flaws and varieties of various British Colonial stamps of the reign of
King George VI (1937-1952) of interest to the specialist KGVI collector. They
are chosen from a range of colonies and reflect the work of different printers.
I invite you to comment on these flaws.
Can you provide any information on them whether you have seen them before,
whether they are constant flaws and what printings they come from.
You will notice that I have
trimmed down the number of items and scans on pages 1 to 5. This is primarily because I have obtained
sufficient feedback on my queries and also because I have decided to remove some
of the less significant flaws in order to make room for more web pages.
I would like to thank those
collectors who have contacted me to discuss the scans. You have been very helpful.
____________________________________________________________________
This is a very noticeable & significant flaw and easily seen without magnification. It is unlisted and I don’t know whether it is mentioned in any articles on the Mauritius keyplates, but in an article by Dickon Pollard he mentions “that the last stamp on plate 3 on each row has “ a shadow extra frameline at the right accompanied by doublings of ‘Revenue’ and the ornaments at right”. Is this current copy a variation of this flaw that Dickon mentions? Or is it a completely different flaw. It comes from the Tangri collection and was not identified as a
2. Aden 1951
overprints, 15c deep ultramarine (SG38)
with a small “S” in ‘cents’ in the overprint.
Is this small ‘s’ actually a small ‘s’ or is it a poor impression of the ‘s’ of ‘cents’ during printing. Either way, it looks nice as a flaw & is easily seen with the naked eye.
3.
Did someone drop the plate at the printers? They should be more careful. I understand that this flaw is mentioned in
articles on the KGVI small keyplates. It comes from the Tangri
collection, but along with the
4.
Jamaica 1938 KGVI 2d green, (CW 6B) with the ‘man fishing’ flaw.
On the other hand, this listed flaw is also from the Tangri collection and is identified in the collection. In fact, there are two copies of the flaw (copy 1 & copy 2) & I have scanned them separately for viewing. If you look closely, you will see that the flaws appear to be different & that they are two different shades. One also has an additional flaw at the top of the scan & also on the bottom frame. I would assume that this means that they are from different printings. I did not have even one copy previously, so I’ll leave the two to keep each other company.
5. Tangier
1949, KGVI 10/- Blue (SG275)
overprint with damage to the ‘PEE’ of ‘RUPEES”.
I am not very familiar with the flaws in the KGVI Tangier overprints. I notice that among my collection, they are not very common, but I am not really sure. Anyway, it is nice to see flaws in the high values.
I found this flaw on a multiple that I have of the value. It is at R10/6 and the flaw is best seen in the last two lines of the overprint. Are these double impressions very common. It is the first that I have come across on this set.
The Hong Kong KGVI definitives
are a great area for the specialist.
Like
Does
anyone know about this flaw? We don’t
often see flaws in the New Hebrides KGVI sets.
For
the keyplate specialists. This is obviously not the same flaw as the Leewards 2-1/2d as the value tablets are not common to both
the
9. Hong Kong 1938 KGVI , Three different flaws. The $2.00
The
Hong Kong KGVI definitives are a great area for the
specialist. Like
10
.
Does
anyone know about this flaw? We don’t
often see flaws in the New Hebrides KGVI sets.
11.Mauritius, 1938, 4c Deep blue-green (CW3b), a plate
block of the 4/48 printing with a broken
value tablet at R 2/2, similar to the Leeward 2-1/2d on page 1 of this web
site. All four stamps in the block have
noticeable flaws. Notice that R2/2 also
has a break in the lower value tablet frame below the ‘c’.
For the keyplate specialists.
This is obviously not the same flaw as the Leewards
2-1/2d as the value tablets are not common to both the
____________________________________________________________________________________
You can Contact me by email at acole@bigpond.net.au