Anthony

KGVI Errors

Page 2



Attached are a further five items with flaws and varieties that you might find interesting.   Each item has two or more scans to illustrate the flaws and the points I am making.   



1.  Seychelles 1938 3c, perf specimen (SG136s) with a scratch going up from from 11.00 o'clock from the 'G' of GIANT.  

This significant flaw on the 3c, being perforated 'specimen', is naturally from the first printing.  I have this perf specimen set and many of the other values also have very obvious flaws.  I am well aware that the Seychelles KGVI set is a great area for the collection of flaws.  Nevertheless, I still wonder whether the copies perforated specimen may have been chosen from stamps that would normally have been rejected during quality control.   

2.  Gibraltar 2/- (Sg128b) with the tadpole flaw .

This flaw was the topic of a recent article in Sixth Sense .  According to the article it is a constant flaw and is easy to see with the naked eye and occurs on R10/6 of the sheet.   After searching in my collection I found a copy of the flaw on one of the 2/- values.  

3.  Straits Settlements  $2.00, (SG291) with a damaged lower left '$' sign .

Has anyone seen this flaw before, I do not know much about KGVI Malaya.  

4.  Bechuanaland 1938 1/-, (SG125) with re-entry on the  right value tablet.

British Africa specialists.  Have you seen this noticeable doubling of the 1/- value before.  This is a very significant re-entry and can be easily seen with the naked ete.  In addition, unlike other re-entries, it can be scanned without difficulty.  Do you know what is it's position on the sheet & what printing(s) it come from.

5.   Bahamas  KGVI, 1/2d (SG162) of the 1942 overprinted set with the lower left rounded corner & the 1/2d ( SG149) with the large dot on the lower edge of the head plate'.    
 
Did you read the excellent article on the Bahamas Definitives flaws by Mike Delise recently published in George VI .  These two constant, but still unlisted flaws are included to illustrate how easy that are to see with the naked eye when you are going though a batch of Bahamas definitives.  In my opinion, they are two of those listed in the article, which I consider should eventually become listed in catalogues as they are constant across printings.  My copy of the 'rounded corner' (R10/1 on the left pane) is from the 1942 overprinted set and shows that it is also found among that set as well.  I think that the other example, large 'dot' on the lower head frame (R10/4 on the right pane), is reminicent of the missing pearl of the large keyplates. It too is a constant flaw and is easily seen with the naked eye.       



            Page 3                 To page 4

            To page 5

            Return to home page