George VI
Errors & Varieties
This web site contains scans of
mostly unlisted flaws and varieties of various British Colonial stamps of the reign
of King George VI (1937-1952) of interest to the specialist KGVI collector.
They are chosen from a range of colonies and reflect the work of different
printers.
In item 3, there are 3 scans to
illustrate the point I am making. In items 2, 4 and 9 there are two scans, the
first is a copy of the whole stamp and the second is the flaw magnified.
I invite you to comment on these flaws.
Can you provide any information on them whether you have seen them before,
whether they are constant flaws and what printings they come from.
Is
this a printing flaw or a mis-spelling of the word PIROQUE. As it is a French word, did someone at the printers
place an accent over the 'E'.
Keyplate specialists. It has been suggested that this
is not a flaw in the true sense of the word, ie., damage to the plate,
but that some grit may have gotten between the plate and the paper during
printing. If this was the case, then it may be a semi-constant flaw, which
occurred during one printing and other examples may exist. What do you think?
These
two flaws appear identical on both values. As there was one printing with the
The position of the S-O joined flaw has
been identified from two philatelic sources.
Dickon Pollard & Tanzy
Brown at MurrayPayne and also Tony Belfield, both in
the UK, have identified the position as R2/6. Tony Belfield added that it is from the
August 1944 printing.
I would like to thank these KGVI
specialists for their assistance in identifying the flaw.
Keyplate specialists. Was this major break caused by
actual damage to the value tablet? If so, it would have been noticed and
repaired quickly. Has anyone seen any other similar examples? Also included is a scan of the value
tablet.
Dickon
Pollard & Tanzy Brown at Murraypayne
Ltd have looked at this scan and consider that the
position of this variety is found at R10/4RP on the Nov 42 printing.
Again
thanks to Dickon and Tanzy
Does
anyone know about this flaw? North Borneo is not my area.
This
is a very noticeable flaw that undoubtedly should not have gotten past quality
control during printing. As a result, it is unlikely that many examples exist.
What do you think caused it? Is it a scratch?
Does
anyone know if this is a constant flaw and which printing it comes from.
8.
Keyplate specialists. Is this a constant flaw and which printing
does it come from?
9.
The
Recently I have been getting the impression that very few
KGVI and/or keyplate specialists have ever seen this
presentation envelope before. The Bermuda Post Office, for whatever reason, did
not send an A5 size hardcover folder to the UPU congress in Paris in 1947 along
with the other colonies. Instead they sent this envelope to the congress
containing samples of stamps on sale in the colony. Have you seen it before.
You can Contact me by email at acole@bigpond.net.au